Indirekte kommunikativ konstituering
Mod en retorisk forståelse af det europæiske samarbejde
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v9i35.221Abstract
EU er en retorisk proces, hvilket vil sige at den generelle forståelse af, hvad EU er og bør være, fremkommer via diskussioner af konkrete problemstillinger i specifikke kontekster. Denne artikel påpeger, at selvom samfundsvidenskabelige teorier om den Europæiske Union i stigende grad er opmærksomme på, at unionen er en kommunikativ størrelse, så har teorierne endnu ikke taget højde for den kommunikative konstituerings retoriske og dermed indirekte natur. Artiklens hovedargument er, at de samfundsvidenskabelige teoriers forklaringspotentiale øges, når den retoriske dimension inddrages. Endvidere argumenterer artiklen for, at retorikken bliver i stand til at bidrage til forklaringen af samfundsdannelse som sådan, hvis en samfundsvidenskabelig forståelse af sammenhængen mellem legitimitet, identitet og offentlig meningsdannelse inddrages i den retoriske teoridannelse.
Referenser
Bañkowski, Zenon & Emilios Christodoulidis (1998): “The European Union as an Essentially Contested Project”, i: European Law Journal, 4, 4, 341-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00057
Best, Steven & Douglas Kellner (1991): Postmodern Theory. Critical Interrogations. Communincations and Culture, The Macmillan Press Ltd., London.
Biesecker, Barbara (1999 [1989]): “Rethinking the Rhetorical Situation from within the Thematic of Differánce”, i: Lucaites, John L., Celeste M. Condit & Sally Caudill (red.): Contemporary Rhetorical Theory. The Guilford Press, New York, 232-246.
Bitzer, Lloyd F. (1992 [1968]): “The Rhetorical Situation”, i: Philosophy and Rhetoric, supplementary issue, 1-14.
Charland, Maurice (1994 [1987]): “Constitutive Rhetoric: ‘The case of the Peuple Québécois’”, i: Nothstine, William, Carole Blair & Gary A. Copeland (red.): Critical Questions. St. Martin’s Press, New York, 211-232
Critchley, Simon (2000): “Remarks on Derrida and Habermas”, i: Constellations, 7, 4, 455-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00201
Curtin, Deirdre M. (1997): Postnational Democracy. The European Union in search of a political philosophy. Kluwer Law International, The Hague.
Derrida, Jacques (1986): “Declarations of Independence”, i: New Political Science, nr. 15, s. 7-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148608429608
– (1988): Limited Inc. Northwestern University Press, Evanston.
– (1992): The Other Heading. Reflections on Today’s Europe. Indiana UniversityPress, Bloomington.
Det Europæiske Råd (2005): Erklæring fra stats- og regeringscheferne for den europæiske unions medlemsstater om ratifikationen af traktaten om en forfatning for Europa. SN 117/05, Bruxelles.
Eriksen, Erik Oddvar (2004): “Conceptualizing European Public Spheres. General, Segmented and Strong Publics.” ARENA Working Paper, nr. 3, Oslo.
Farrell, Thomas B. (1993): Norms of Rhetorical Culture. Yale University Press, New Haven. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1xp3sn2
Friese, Heidrun & Peter Wagner (2002): “Survey Article: The Nascent Political Philosophy of the European Polity”, i: The Journal of Political Philosophy, 10, 3, 342-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00156
Fritsch, Matthias (2002): “Derrida’s Democracy to Come”, i: Constellations, 9, 4, 574-597. Goodnight, G. Thomas & David B. Hingstman DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00304
(1997): “Studies in the Public Sphere”, i: Quarterly Journal of Speech, 83, 351-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639709384190
Grimm, Dieter (1997 [1995]): “Does Europe need a Constitution?”, i: Gowan, Peter & Perry Anderson (eds.): The Question of Europe. Verso, London, 239-258.
Kock, Christian (1997): “Retorikkens identitet”, i: Rhetorica Scandinavica, 1, 10-19.
Habermas, Jürgen (1970): “Towards a Theory of Communicative Competence”, i: Inquiry, 13, 360-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747008601597
– (1996 [1981]): Teorien om den kommunikative handlen. Aalborg Universitetsforlag, Aalborg.
– (1996 [1992]): Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
– (1997b [1995]): “Reply to Grimm”, i: Gowan, Peter & Perry Anderson (red.): The Question of Europe. Verso, London, 259-264.
– (1998): The Inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
– (2001): The Postnational Constellation. Political Essays. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
– (2002): “Toward a European Political Community”, i: Society, juli/august, 58-61. Hasian, Marouf (1994): “Critical Legal Rhetorics: The Theory and Practice of Law in a Postmodern World”, i: Southern Communication Journal, 60, 1, 44-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372961
Hauser, Gerard A. (1999): Vernacular Voices. The Rhetoric of Publics and Public Spheres. University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Kant, Immanuel (1996 [1784]): “An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?”, i: Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, s. 11-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813306.005
Just, Sine N. (2004): The Constitution of Meaning – A Meaningful Constitution? Legitimacy, identity, and public opinion in the debate on the future of Europe. CBS Ph.D. Series 29.2004, København.
Leff, Michael (2003): “Fortolkende retorisk kritik”, i: Rhetorica Scandinavica, 26, s. 6-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52610/ZCMG8546
Lucaites, John (1981): “Rhetoric and the Problem of Legitimacy”, i: Ziegelmueller, George & Jack Rhodes (red.): Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Speech Communication Association, Annandale, Virginia, s. 799-811.
Lyotard, Jean-Fracois (1996 [1979]): Viden og det postmoderne samfund. Slagmarks Skyttegravsserie, Århus.
McGee, Michael C. (1999 [1975]): “In Search of ‘the People’: A Rhetorical Alternative”, i: Lucaites, John L., Celeste M. Condit & Sally Caudill (red.): Contemporary Rhetorical Theory. The Guilford Press, New York, 341-356.
Moravcsik, Andrew (1999): “Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Constructivism and European integration”, i: Journal of European Public Policy, 6, 4, 669-681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/135017699343531
Simonson, Peter (2001): “Rhetoric and legitimation”, i: Sloane, Thomas O. (red.): Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 622-624.
Stob, Paul (2005): “Kenneth Burke, John Dewey, and the Pursuit of the Public”, i: Philosophy & Rhetoric, 38, 3, 226-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/par.2005.0022
Vatz, Richard E. (1973): “The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation”, i: Philosophy and Rhetoric, 6, 3, s. 154-161.
Ward, Ian (1995): “Identity and Difference: The European Union and Postmodernism”, i: Shaw, Jo & Gillian More (eds.): New Legal Dynamics of European Union. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 15-28
##submission.downloads##
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2024 Rhetorica Scandinavica
Detta verk är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande-Ickekommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
