Tusenbenets vakre dans
Forholdet mellom formkunnskap og sjangerbeherskelse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v5i18.274Abstract
I hvilken grad er eksplisitt undervisning en hjelp til sjangerbeherskelse? Vil man for eksempel skrive bedre fortellinger etter å ha blitt gjort oppmerksom på hvordan fortellinger er bygd opp og hvilke retoriske virkemidler som karakteriserer sjangeren? Hvor viktig er i det hele tatt eksplisitt formkunnskap for skriveferdigheten? Slike spørsmål har stått i sentrum i den skrivepedagogiske debatten de siste tiårene, og Frøydis Hertzberg gir her en oversikt over de ulike posisjonene i forskningen på området.1
Referenser
Applebee, Arthur M. (1986): ”Problems in Process Approaches: Toward a Reconceptualization of Process Instruction”, i: Petrosky & Bartholemae (red.): The Teaching of Writing. Eighty-fifth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II Chapter VI, side 95-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146818608700606
Bereiter, Carl & Marlene Scardamalia (1984): ”Learning About Writing from Reading”, i: Written Communication, Vol. 1 No. 2, side 163-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088384001002001
Berge, Kjell Lars, Patrick Coppock & Eva Maagerø (1998): Å skape mening med språk. En samling artikler av M.A.K. Halliday, R. Hasan og J.R. Martin. Oslo: Landslaget for norskundervisning/Cappelen Akademisk.
Braddock, R., R. Lloyd-Jones & L. Schoer (1963): Research in Written Composition. Cham paign, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English.
Dysthe, Olga (1990): ”Prosessorientert skrivepedagogikk – utviklingsoptimisme eller formal isme?”, i: Norsk Peda - gogisk Tidsskrift 1/1990, side 38-49.
Ellis, Rod (1990): Instructed Second Language Acquisition: Learning in the Classroom. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fahnestock, Jeanne (1993): “Genre and Rhetorical Craft”, i: Research in the Teaching of English, Vol. 27. No 3, side 265-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/rte199315404
Fayol, M. (1991): “Text Typologies: A Cognitive Approach, i: G. Denhiere & J-P. Rossie (red.): Text and Text Processing. Advances in Psychology 79, side 61-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61549-6
Feldman, C. & D.A. Kalmar (1996): “Some Educational Implications of Genre-based Mental Models: The Interpretive Cognition of Text Understanding”, i: D.R. Olson & N. Torrance (red.): The Handbook of Education and Human Development. Oxford: Blackwell, side 434-460. Freedman, Aviva (1987): ”Learning to Write Again: Discipline-Specific Writing at Univer sity”, i: Carleton Papers in Applied Language Studies, Volume IV, side 95-115.
- (1993a): ”Show and Tell? The Role of Explicit Teaching in the Learning of New Genres”, i: Research in the Teaching of English, Vol. 27 No. 3, side 222-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/rte199315402
- (1993b): “Situating Genre: A Rejoinder”, i: Research in the Teaching of English, Vol. 27 No. 3, side 272-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/rte199315405
Gerot, Linda (1996): ”A Genre-based Approach to Teaching English Literacy”, i: Frances Christie & Joseph Foley (red.): Some Contemporary Themes in Literacy Research. International Association of Research in Mother Tongue Education. New York: Waxmann Münster, side 217-247.
Hertzberg, Frøydis (1995): Norsk grammatikkdebatt i historisk lys. Oslo-studier i språkviten skap 12. Oslo: Novus.
Hiebert, H.E. & T.E. Raphael (1996): “Psychological Perspectives on Literacy and Extensions to Educational Practice”, i: D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (red.): Handbook of Educational Psychology, New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA, side 550 ff.
Hillocks, George (1984): ”What Works in Teaching Composition: A Meta-analysis of Experi mental Treatment Studies”, i: American Journal of Education, Vol. 93 No. 1, side 133-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/443789
– (1986a): Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching. National Conference on Research in English. ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Communication Skills, National Institute of Education..
– (1986b): ”The Writer’s Knowledge: Theory, Research and Implications for practice”, i: Petrosky & Bartholemae (red.): The Teaching of Writing. Eighty-fifth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II Chapter V, side 71-94.
Igland, Mari-Ann (1989): ”Nye vegar i skriveopplæringa? Eikritisk gjennomgang av George Hillocks: Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching”, i: Eva Bjørkvold & Sylvi Penne (red.): Skriving i skolen 2. Oslo: Landslaget for norskunder visning/Cappelen, side 92-106.
Jensen, Karen (1999): ”Mellom tradisjon og fornyelse – Introduksjon til den norske utgaven”, i: Nielsen & Kvale 1999, side 5-11.
Johannessen, Kjell S. (2000): ”Kunnskapens ulike artikulasjonsmodi”, i: Uniped 3/2000, side 23-37.
Kolln, Martha (1981): ”Closing the Books on Alchemy”, i: College Composition and Commu nication, Vol. 32 No. 5, side 139-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198115907
Krashen, Stephen (1984): Writing: Research, Theory, and Applications. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English.
Larsson, Kent (1982): Skrivförmåga. Studier i svenskt elevspråk. Malmö: Liber.
Lundeberg, M.A. (1987): “Metacognitive Aspects of Reading Comprehension: Studying Understanding in Legal Case Analysis”, i: Reading Research Quarterly, 4/1987, side 407-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/747700
Martin, J.R. & Joan Rothery (1993): ”Grammar: Making Meaning in Writing”, i: Bill Cope & Mary Kalantzis (red.): The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. London: The Falmer Press, side 137-153.
Mitchell, Rosemund (1994a): “Grammar, Syllabuses and Teachers”, i: Martin Bygate m.fl. (red.): Grammar and the Language Teacher, New York: Prentice Hall, side 90-104.
– (1994b): “Foreign Language Teachers and the Teaching of Grammar”, i: Martin Bygate m.fl. (red.): Grammar and the Language Teacher, New York: Prentice Hall, side 215-223.
Nielsen, Klaus & Steinar Kvale (red.) (1999): Mesterlære – Læring som sosial praksis. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.
Pearson, P.D. & K. Camperell (1994): “Comprehension of Text Structures”, i: R.B. Ruddell m.fl. (red.): Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association, side 448-468.
Reid, Ian (red.) (1987): The Place of Genre in Learning: Current Debates. Typereader Publi cations No. 1, Centre for Studies in Literary Education, Deakin University.
Schwegler, Robert A. (1988): ”Conflicting Methods in Composition Research”, i: College Eng lish, Vol. 50 No 4, side 444-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ce198811400
Skaftesmo, Trond (1995): “Tusenbeinet og padden”, i: Klassekampen 16. september.
Sletta, Olav (1973): "Grammatikken ut av morsmålsopplæringen?", i: Norsk Pedagogisk Tidskrift 9-10/1973, side 366-380. (Trykt opp i Frøydis Hertzberg & Ernst
Håkon Jahr (red.) (1980): Grammatikk i morsmålsundervisninga? Oslo: Novus, side 39-56.)
Smith, Frank (1983): ”Reading Like a Writer”, i: Language Arts, Vol. 60 No. 5, side 558-567. (Finnes også i norsk oversettelse under tittelen ”Å lese som en forfatter”, i DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/la198326306
Eva Bjørkvold & Sylvi Penne (red.) (1991): Skriveteori. Oslo: Landslaget for norskundervisning/Cappelen, side 30-42.)
Tønnessen, Finn Egil. (1999): “Awareness and Automaticity in Reading”, i: Ingvar Lundberg m.fl. (red.): Dyslexia: Advances in Theory and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, side 91-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4667-8_7
Williams, Joseph M. & Gregory G. Colomb (1993): “The Case for Explicit Teaching: Why What You Don’t Know Won’t Help You”, i: Research in the Teaching of English, Vol. 27, No. 3, side 252-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/rte199315403
##submission.downloads##
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2024 Rhetorica Scandinavica
Detta verk är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande-Ickekommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
