At argumentere med billeder
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v16i60.177Abstract
I argumentationsteorien opfattes billeder normalt som ude af stand til at argumentere. I denne tekst behandler Jens E. Kjelden antagelserne om at argumentation er bundet til eksplicit verbal kommunikation og at billeders semiotiske karakter umuliggør sådan argumentation. Frem for dette syn, skriver han, bør vi hellere betragte argumentation som handlinger; og eftersom billeder kan bruges til at udsige og handle, kan de også bruges til at argumentere.
Referenser
Aristoteles. Retorik. Oversat med introduktion af Thure Hastrup. København: Museum Tusculanums Forlag, 1999.
Barthes, Roland. ”Billedets retorik.” I Visuel Kommunikation. bd. 1. Redigeret af Bent Fausing & Peter Larsen, 42-57. København: Medusa. København, 1980 (1964).
Baxandall, M. Giotto And the Orators. Humanistic Observers of Painting in Italy and the Discovery of Pictorial Composition 1350-1450. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.
Birdsell, David S. & Leo Groarke. “Toward A Theory Of Visual Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy, 33/1 (1996): 1-10.
Blair, J. Anthony. “The Rhetoric of Visual Arguments.” I Defining Visual Rhetorics, redigeret af Charles A. Hill & Marguerite Helmers, 41-62. Mahwah; N.J/London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004.
Boorstin, Daniel J. The Image. A Guide to Pseudo-events in America. 25th Anniversary edition with a new foreword by the author and an afterword by Gorge F. Will. New York: First Vintage Books, 1992 (1961).
Brockriede, Wayne. “Where is Argument?” I Readings in Argumentation, redigeret af Wiliam L. Benoit, Dale Hample & Pamela J. Benoit, 73-78. Berlin, New York: Foris Publications, 1992 (1974). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885651.73
Chandler, Daniel. Semiotics: The Basics. New York: Routledge, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166277
Cox, Robert J. & Charles Arthur Willard. “Introduction: The Field of Argumentation.” I Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, redigeret af Robert J. Cox, & Charles Arthur Willard, xiii-xlvii. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982.
Eco, Umberto. Den frånvarande strukturen. Stockholm: Bo Cavefors, 1971.
Eco, Umberto. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979 (1976).
Frans H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, F.S. Henkemans, J.A. Blair, R.H. Johnson, E.C.W. Krabbe, C. Plantin, D.N. Walton, C.A. Willard, J. Woods & David Zarefsky. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. A Handbook of Historical backgrounds and Contemporary Developments.
New York and London: Routledge, 2009 (1996).
Eemeren, Frans van, Rob Grootendorst & Tjark Kruiger. Handbook of Argumentation Theory. A Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies. Dordrecht-Holland/Providence-U.S.A: Foris Publications, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846096
Finnegan, Cara A. ”The naturalistic enthymeme and visual argument: photographic representation in the ”skull controversy.” Argumentation and Advocacy 37 (2001): 133-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2001.11951665
Fleming, David. “Can Pictures Be Arguments?” Argumentation and Advocacy 33/1 (1996): 11-22.
Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art. An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis, New York, Kansas City: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968.
Gombrich, E.H. “The Visual Image.” Scientific American: An Illustrated Journal of Art & Science 227/3 (1972): 82-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0972-82
Gombrich, E.H. Art and Illusion. A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Priceton: Princeton University Press, 1989 (1960).
Groarke, Leo. ”Five Theses on Toulmin and Visual Argument.” I Pondering on Problems of Argumentation, redigeret af F.H. van Eemeren B. Garssen, 229-239. Amsterdam: Springer, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9165-0_16
Gronbeck, Bruce E. 1995. “Unstated Propositions: Relationships Among Verbal, Visual, and Acoustic Languages.” I Argumentation and Values: Proceedings of the Ninth SCA/AFA conference on Argumentation, 539-542. Annandale: VA:SCA, 1995.
Hample, Dale. “A Cognitive View of Argument.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 17 (1980): 151-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1980.11951168
Hample, Dale. “A Third Perspective on Argument.” I Readings in Argumentation, redigeret af Wiliam L. Benoit, Dale Hample & Pamela J. Benoit, 91-115. Berlin, New York: Foris Publications, 1992 (1974). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885651.91
Holly, M.A. Past Looking. Historical Imagination and the Rhetoric of the Image. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501725692
Jay, Martin. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of vision in twentieth-century. California: University of California Press, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520915381
Johnson, Ralph H. “Why ‘Visual Arguments’ aren’t Arguments.” I Informal Logic at 25, redigeret af Hans V. Hansen, Christopher Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, and Ralph H. Johnson. CDROM. Winsor, Ont.: U of Winsor 2004.
Jørgensen, Charlotte & Merete Onsberg. Praktisk argumentation. København: Teknisk Forlag, 1987.
Kjeldsen, Jens E. Tale med billeder, tegne med ord. Oslo: Spartacus forlag, 2011.
Kjeldsen, Jens E. ”Visual argumentation in an Al Gore Keynote presentation on climate change.” I. Argumentation: Cognition and Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18-21, 2011. Redigeret af F. Zenker. Windsor, ON (CD ROM).
Kjeldsen, Jens E. ”Visual Tropes and Figures as Visual Argumentation.” I Proceedings. Seventh International conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. June 29-July 2, 2010, redigeret af Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden & Gordon
Mitchell. Amsterdam: Sic Sat, 2011.
Kjeldsen, Jens E. ”Visual argumentation in Scandinavian Political Advertising: A cognitive, contextual, and reception oriented approach.” Argumentation and Advocacy 34/3-4 (2007): 124-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2007.11821668
Kjeldsen, Jens E. “Øjets frygt og ærefrygt. Om Helenas pris og modviljen mod retorik og visuelle appeller.” Rhetorica Scandinavica 41 (2007): 11-25.
Kjeldsen, Jens E. ”Talking to the Eye – Visuality in ancient rhetoric.” Word & Image 19 (2003): 133-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02666286.2003.10406228
Kjeldsen, Jens E. Visuel retorik. Bergen: Medievitenskap/Universitetet i Bergen, 2002.
Kjørup, Søren. “George Inness and the Battle at Hastings, or Doing Things with Pictures.” The Monist. An International Quarterly Journal of General Philosophical Inquiry 58/2 (1974): 216-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197458217
Kjørup, Søren. “Iconic Codes and Pictorial Speech Acts.” Orbis Litterarum. Supplement No. 4. Danish Semiotics, redigeret af J.D. Johansen & M. Nøjgaard Munksgaard. Copenhagen. (1978): 101-122.
Kjørup, Søren. “Pictorial Speech Acts.” Erkenntnis 12 (1978): 55-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209915
Kjørup, Søren. “Billedkommunikation”. I Visuel kommunikation I, redigeret af Bent Fausing & Peter Larsen, 58-80. København: Medusa, 1980.
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London & New York: Routledge, 1996
Messaris, Paul. Visual Persuasion. The Role of Images in Advertising. Sage Publications, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233444
Mitchell, W.J.T. Iconography. Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.
O’Keefe, D.J. “The Concepts of Argument and Arguing.” I Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, redigeret af J.R. Cox & C.A Willard, 3-23. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP, 1982.
O’Keefe, D.J. “Two Concepts of Argument.” I Readings in Argumentation, redigeret af Wiliam L. Benoit, Dale Hample & Pamela J. Benoit, 79-90. Berlin, New York: Foris Publications, 1992
Perelman, Chaïm & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1971(1969).
Postman, Neil. Fagre nye TV-verden. København: Hekla, 1987.
Pudovkin, Vsevolod. Film Technique, and Film Acting. London: Vision, 1958 (1929).
Pudovkin, Vsevolod “[On Editing]”. I Film Theory and Criticism. Introductory Readings, Fourth Edition, redigeret af Gerald Mast, Marshall Cohen & Leo Braudy, 121-26. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992 (1929).
Rosengren, Mats. ”On Creation, Cave Art and Perception: A Doxological Approach.” I Thesis Eleven 90 (2007): 79-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513607079258
Scott, Linda M. “Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric.” I Journal of consumer research, 21/september (1994): 252-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209396
Toulmin, Stephen. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
Toulmin, Stephen, Richard Rieke & Allan Jannik. An Introduction to Reasoning. Second Ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1984.
##submission.downloads##
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2024 Rhetorica Scandinavica
Detta verk är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande-Ickekommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
