Sørg hellere for en solid tremmeseng”. Feministiske udfordringer til retorikken
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v11i42.196Nyckelord:
Feminist rhetorical theory, women studies, gender studies, donor inseminationAbstract
Feministisk retorisk teori er kendetegnet ved et tværfagligt perspektiv. I denne artikel skitserer vi først tilblivelsen og udviklingen af feministisk retorisk teori – helt konkret forbindelserne til traditionel retorik samt kvinde- og kønsforskning. Indlemmelse og differentiering er nøglestrategier inden for kvinde- og kønsforskningen, mens transformation er kernen i feministisk retorisk teori. Derefter analyserer vi en aktuel case, nemlig Scandinavian Cryobanks salg af skandinaviske mænds sæd til USA og den marketing der findes på selskabets hjemmeside. Hvorimod kvinde- og kønsforskning udvikler forskellige analyser, placerer feministisk retorisk teori det retoriske i en konkret sammenhæng og fremhæver dens potentiale for forvandling.
Referenser
Aptheker, Bettina (1989): Tapestries of Life: Women’s Work, Women’s Consciousness, and the Meaning of Daily Experience. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.
Alvarez, Lizette (2004): “Spreading Scandinavian Genes, Without Viking Boats.” New York Times, 20. september 2004. Hentet fra http://www.scandinaviancryobank.com/spreading-scandinaviangenes.aspx 28. juni, 2005.
Bailey, Courtney (1997): “Bitching and Talking/-Gazing Back: Feminism as Critical Reading.” Women and Language, vol. 26, nr. 2, side 1-8.
Bate, Barbara, & Anita Taylor (red.) (1988): Women Communicating: Studies of Women’s Talk. Ablex, Norwood.
Bellafonte, Gina (1998): “It’s All About Me!” Time. 29. juni, vol. 151, nr. 25, forsidehistorie.
Butler, Judith (1990): Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, New York/London.
Condit, Celeste (1997): “In Praise of Eloquent Diversity: Gender and Rhetoric as Public Persuasion.” Women’s Studies in Communication, vol. 20, nr. 3, side 91-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.1997.10162405
Crenshaw, Kimberle W. (1994): “Mapping the Margins, Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color”, i: M. Fineman & R. Mykitiuk (red.). The Public Nature of Private Violence. Routledge, New York, (s. 93-118).
Foss, Karen A.; Sonja K. Foss (1989): “Incorporating the Feminist Perspective in Communication Scholarship: A Research Commentary”, i: C. Spitzack & K. Carter (Eds.). Doing Research on Women’s Communication: Alternative Perspectives in Theory and Method. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex, (s. 65-91).
– (1991): Women Speak: The Eloquence of Women’s Lives. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights.
Foss, Karen A. & Sonja K. Foss (1994): “Personal Experience as Evidence in Feminist Scholarship.” Western Journal of Communication, vol. 58, side 39-43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319409374482
Foss, Sonja K., Karen A. Foss, & Robert Trapp (2002): Contemporary Perspectives on Rhetoric, 3rd ed. Waveland, Prospect Heights.
Foss, Sonja K., Karen A. Foss & Cindy L. Griffin (1999): Feminist Rhetorical Theories. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi.
Foss, Sonja K. & Cindy L. Griffin (1995): “Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric,” 62 Communication Monographs, side 2-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376345
Friedan, Betty (1963): The Feminine Mystique. Dell, New York.
Gearhart, Sally Miller (1979): “The womanization of rhetoric,” 2 Women’s Studies International Quarterly, side 195-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-0685(79)91809-8
Gomard, Kirsten (1996): “Sprog, kommunikation og køn – med Århus Byråd som eksempel.” Kvinder, Køn og Forskning, vol. 2 1996, side 5-17.
Halberstam, Judith (1998): Female masculinity. Duke University Press, Durham/London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hpjb1
Harding, Sandra (1991): Whose Science Whose Knowledge: Thinking From Women’s Lives. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
hooks, bell (1989): Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. South End Press, Boston. http://odin.dep.no/odin/engelsk/norway/history/032005-990460. Retrieved May 9, 2006.
Hunter College Women’s Studies Collective (2005). Women’s Realities, Women’s Choices: An Introduction to Women’s Studies, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, New York.
Kohrs Campbell, Karlyn (1989): Man Cannot Speak for Her, Volume 1; A Critical Study of Early Feminist Rhetoric. Greenwood Press, Westport CT.
Kohrs Campbell, Karlyn (1973): “The rhetoric of women’s liberation: An oxymoron,” 59 The Quarterly Journal of Speech, side 74-86. Svensk oversættelse: ”Kvinnorörelsens retorik: en oxymoron” af Lennart Hellspong i Rhetorica Scandinavica nr 27/2003.
Kramer, Cheris (1974): “Women’s speech: Separate but unequal?” 60 The Quarterly Journal of Speech, side 14-24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637409383203
Kramer, Cheris. (1977): ”Perceptions of female and male speech”, i: Language and Speech 20, side 151-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097702000207
Kroløkke, Charlotte (2006): “Net Chicks’ and Geekgirls’ Remixing of Frontier and Pioneer Rhetoric.” Iowa Journal of Communication: Special Issue on Feminist Communication, volume 38, side 55-73.
Mral, Brigitte. (2003): “Motståndets retorik. Om kvinnors argumentative strategier.” Rhetorica Scandinavica, nr. 27, side 34-50.
Öhrberg, Ann. (2001): Vittra fruntimmer. Författarroll och retorik hos frihetstidens Kvinnliga författare, Skrifter utgivna av Avdelningen for litteratursociologi vid Litteraturvetenskapliga institutionen i Uppsala 45 (afhandling Uppsala, Hedemora).
Schmidt, Matthew & Lisa J. Moore (1998): “Constructing a ‘Good Catch,’ Picking a Winner”, i: R. Davis-Floyd & J. Dumit (red.). Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots. New York, London: Routledge, (s. 21-39).
Sedgwick, Eve K. (1990): Epistemology of the Closet. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Talan, Jamie (2005): “For prospective parents in the market for a blonde-haired, blue-eyed tot, Danish sperm marks the sale.” Newsday 5. juni, 2005. Hentet fra www.scandinaviancryobank.com/-spreading-scandinavian-genes.aspx 28. juni, 2005.
Warnick, Barbara (1998): “Rhetorical Criticism of Public Discourse on the Internet: Theoretical Implications.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 28, nr. 4, side 73-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02773949809391131
Wood, Julia T. (1992): “Gender and moral voice: Moving from women’s nature to standpoint epistemology,” 15 Women’s Studies in Communication, side 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.1992.11089757
www.scandinaviancryobank.org Hentet 15. februar, 2006.
Young, Iris Marion (1994): “Gender as Seriality: Thinking about Women as a Social Collective”, i: Signs. A Journal of Women in Culture and Society. Vol. 19, nr. 3, side 713-739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/494918
##submission.downloads##
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2024 Rhetorica Scandinavica
Detta verk är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande-Ickekommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
